Last scanned Aug 31, 2026 · Methodology v4.6 · View Leaderboard →
rxinform.org scored 64/100 on AI-readiness across 48 parameters measured against ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, Perplexity, and Gemini visibility checks. 18 parameters passed, 11 failed, and 12 need improvement. Strongest area: Crawlability & Access. Weakest: Discovery & Metadata. Compared to other Health sites, this score is in the 65th percentile.
The website rxinform.org, which features the page title RxInform, is categorized under health.medicine. Based on a scan by friendly4AI, the site has been evaluated and assigned an AI-readiness score of 64. This score indicates the platform's current readiness level. By analyzing these key details, the scan helps the site owner understand where the RxInform platform stands in the health.medicine category according to the friendly4AI system metrics.
18 Pass
11 Fail
12 Needs Improvement
These are derived on-page readiness estimates for each engine's grounding index — not live engine queries.
How easily AI engines can extract and cite this page. Combines freshness, schema, and answer-block placement.
Freshness
Fresh — last modified 0 days ago. Inside the 7–14 day refresh window AI engines reward.
Source:date_headerFreshness: page modified 0 days ago. Inside Perplexity 2–3 day window. Inside 13-week recent band. Far from 26-week at-risk threshold.
Perplexity 2–3dSchema / Structured Data
2 schema types detected (website, localbusiness). Adding FAQPage is usually the highest-leverage next step.
Answer Block
Answer block present — 44 words at position 146, inside a 134-word context passage. Matches the documented 40–60 word target.
Answer block starts at word 146, spans 44 words within a 134-word context passage.
Parameters that determine how well AI crawlers can discover and index your content.
robots.txt accessibilityLearn more | Pass |
HTTP status and reachabilityLearn more | Pass |
Fail | |
Pass | |
AI crawler access controlLearn more | Pass |
Paywall and login gating detectionLearn more | Pass |
Search-bot network reachabilityLearn more | Pass |
sitemap.xml availabilityLearn more | Partial |
Structured Data (schema.org)Learn more | Pass |
Page metadataLearn more | Partial |
URL stabilityLearn more | Pass |
Structured data (schema.org/JSON-LD) coverageLearn more | Pass |
Security headers baselineLearn more | Partial |
Fail | |
Internal link coverageLearn more | Fail |
Content-type schema alignmentLearn more | N/A |
IndexNow push-protocol adoptionLearn more | Fail |
Entity grounding via sameAs linksLearn more | Fail |
N/A | |
N/A | |
N/A | |
Fail | |
Fail | |
N/A |
Pass | |
Content visibility without JavaScriptLearn more | Pass |
Pass | |
Fail | |
Nosnippet directive detectionLearn more | Pass |
Paragraph length distributionLearn more | Partial |
Section length distributionLearn more | Partial |
Dated statistics ratioLearn more | Pass |
Comparison table presenceLearn more | N/A |
Entity name consistencyLearn more | Partial |
Multimedia coverage and alignmentLearn more | Partial |
AI manifests coverageLearn more | Fail |
Fail | |
UCP manifest availabilityLearn more | N/A |
Pass | |
Core Web Vitals (page experience)Learn more | Pass |
Parameters that influence how AI systems cite and surface your content in answers.
N/A | |
N/A | |
N/A | |
Fail | |
Fail | |
Fail | |
N/A | |
Pass |
Pass | |
Pass | |
Pass | |
Author authority signalsLearn more | Partial |
Fail | |
Content depthLearn more | Partial |
Citation and evidence densityLearn more | Partial |
Fail | |
Answer-oriented content structureLearn more | Pass |
Answer-first H2 complianceLearn more | Partial |
Chunk extractability (self-contained H2 blocks)Learn more | Partial |
TL;DR / Key Takeaways sectionLearn more | Fail |
Answer block shapeLearn more | Pass |