Last scanned Jun 25, 2026 · Methodology v4.5 · View Leaderboard →
ey.com scored 62/100 on AI-readiness across 48 parameters measured against ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini visibility checks. 21 parameters passed, 11 failed, and 8 need improvement. Strongest area: Discovery & Metadata. Weakest: Answer Positioning. Compared to other other.general sites, this score is in the 86th percentile.
The website ey.com has the page title EY - US | Shape the future with confidence. According to the scan data, the site's meta description is Five key SEC priorities in 2024. In terms of its preparation for artificial intelligence integration, friendly4AI has evaluated the platform and assigned it an AI-readiness score of 62. This profile details the official scanner results for the site, highlighting these specific parameters to assist in understanding its current digital setup.
21 Pass
11 Fail
8 Needs Improvement
These are derived on-page readiness estimates for each engine's grounding index — not live engine queries.
How easily AI engines can extract and cite this page. Combines freshness, schema, and answer-block placement.
Freshness
Fresh — last modified 0 days ago. Inside the 7–14 day refresh window AI engines reward.
Source:date_headerFreshness: page modified 0 days ago. Inside Perplexity 2–3 day window. Inside 13-week recent band. Far from 26-week at-risk threshold.
Perplexity 2–3dSchema / Structured Data
4 schema types detected (website, searchaction, organization, videoobject). Adding FAQPage is the highest-leverage next step (+28% coverage in 21 days).
Answer Block
Answer block too short — 23 words. Target is 40–60 words; expand the opening paragraph to be self-contained for ChatGPT and Perplexity.
Answer block starts at word 251, spans 23 words within a 134-word context passage.
Parameters that determine how well AI crawlers can discover and index your content.
robots.txt accessibilityLearn more | Pass |
HTTP status and reachabilityLearn more | Pass |
Fail | |
Pass | |
AI crawler access controlLearn more | Pass |
Paywall and login gating detectionLearn more | Pass |
Search-bot network reachabilityLearn more | Pass |
sitemap.xml availabilityLearn more | Pass |
Structured Data (schema.org)Learn more | Pass |
Page metadataLearn more | Pass |
URL stabilityLearn more | Pass |
Structured data (schema.org/JSON-LD) coverageLearn more | Pass |
Security headers baselineLearn more | Pass |
Fail | |
Internal link coverageLearn more | Pass |
Content-type schema alignmentLearn more | N/A |
IndexNow push-protocol adoptionLearn more | Fail |
Entity grounding via sameAs linksLearn more | Fail |
N/A | |
N/A | |
N/A | |
Fail | |
Partial | |
N/A |
Partial | |
Content visibility without JavaScriptLearn more | Pass |
Pass | |
Fail | |
Nosnippet directive detectionLearn more | Pass |
Paragraph length distributionLearn more | Partial |
Section length distributionLearn more | Partial |
Dated statistics ratioLearn more | Partial |
Comparison table presenceLearn more | N/A |
Entity name consistencyLearn more | Pass |
Multimedia coverage and alignmentLearn more | Partial |
AI manifests coverageLearn more | Fail |
Fail | |
UCP manifest availabilityLearn more | N/A |
Pass | |
Core Web Vitals (page experience)Learn more | Fail |
Parameters that influence how AI systems cite and surface your content in answers.
N/A | |
N/A | |
N/A | |
Fail | |
Fail | |
Partial | |
N/A | |
Pass |
Partial | |
Pass | |
Pass | |
Author authority signalsLearn more | Fail |
Fail | |
Content depthLearn more | Pass |
Citation and evidence densityLearn more | Pass |
Fail | |
Answer-oriented content structureLearn more | Partial |
Answer-first H2 complianceLearn more | Fail |
Chunk extractability (self-contained H2 blocks)Learn more | Pass |
TL;DR / Key Takeaways sectionLearn more | N/A |
Answer block shapeLearn more | Partial |